How to do an SEO audit step by step: practical guide 2026
The complete process: from first access to Search Console through to prioritising the actions that genuinely move the needle. Includes an actionable checklist and a toolkit.
An SEO audit is the complete diagnostic of all factors affecting a website's visibility in search engines. Learning how to conduct an SEO audit step by step lets you identify exactly what is holding back your rankings and in what order to address it.
This guide walks through the full process: from first access to Search Console through to prioritising the actions that genuinely move the needle. By the end you will have a repeatable method, a concrete list of tools and an actionable checklist you can apply to any project. If at any point you would prefer a professional team to handle the work, you can find out how our professional SEO audit works at the bottom of this page.
What an SEO audit is (and what it is not)
An SEO audit is a structured analysis of all the elements that influence how Google and other search engines crawl, index and rank a website. It is not a quick review of page titles or an automated report pulled from a single tool: it is a diagnostic that combines data from multiple sources with professional judgement to order priorities correctly.
What an SEO audit covers:
- •Crawling and indexation: can Google access your important pages and store them in its index?
- •Technical SEO: speed, mobile, HTTPS, URL structure, errors.
- •On-page: relevance of titles, meta tags, headings and content for target searches.
- •Content quality and EEAT: depth, freshness, experience signals and authority.
- •Internal link architecture: how authority flows between pages.
- •External link profile: which sites link to you and in what context.
- •Presence beyond Google: Bing, AI engines, voice search.
What an SEO audit is not: a full web audit goes further and includes UX, business performance, conversion, security and accessibility. If that 360° diagnostic is what you need, SEO is one layer within that broader analysis.
When to run an SEO audit
An SEO audit is not only relevant at project launch. There are specific situations where it becomes urgent:
Clear signals that you need an SEO audit now:
- •Organic traffic drop of 15% or more over a 4–8 week period with no clear explanation. This could indicate a manual penalty, an algorithm update or a recent technical issue.
- •New site or recent redesign: design and CMS changes are the leading cause of serious technical errors (broken redirects, accidental noindex directives, lost canonicals).
- •Domain migration: the highest-risk SEO change there is. It requires auditing before, during and after the move.
- •Prolonged stagnation: no improvement after 6 months despite regular publishing. This usually points to cannibalisation, structural issues or poorly distributed domain authority.
- •Inconsistent rankings: ranking for long-tail terms but not for the main head terms in your sector.
Recommended cadence for ongoing maintenance:
A full SEO audit makes sense at least every 12 months. For actively growing projects, every 6 months. Partial reviews covering indexation, new content and code changes should be part of the continuous monthly workflow.
What you need before you start
Before opening any tool, make sure you have access to these data sources. Without them, you are working blind.
Essential access
| Source | Purpose | Access level required |
|---|---|---|
| Google Search Console | Real crawl and indexation data, keywords, errors | Owner or verified user |
| Google Analytics 4 / GA4 | User behaviour, landing pages, conversions | Viewer or higher |
| CMS access (WordPress, etc.) | Review technical configuration, SEO plugins, .htaccess | Administrator |
| FTP / server (where applicable) | Check robots.txt, sitemaps, server-level redirects | Optional but useful |
Crawling tool
You need at least one tool that replicates Googlebot's behaviour and returns a complete site inventory.
Free options:
- •Screaming Frog SEO Spider (up to 500 URLs in the free version): the industry standard for small and medium sites. Detects 4xx/5xx errors, redirect chains, duplicate titles, pages without canonicals, and more.
- •Google Search Console already includes coverage reports, although with a delay of several days.
Paid options (for large sites or recurring use):
- •Screaming Frog with licence (unlimited URLs, JS rendering, GA4 and GSC integration).
- •Sitebulb: highly visual, recommended for client presentations.
- •Ahrefs Site Audit: good for combining crawling and backlink analysis on a single platform.
Keyword and competitive analysis tool
For the content and ranking analysis you need keyword data. Google Search Console already covers the searches your site appears for. To research opportunities outside your current profile, tools such as Ahrefs, Semrush or SE Ranking (all paid, with limited free trials) are the market references.
For a basic audit with no budget: Google Search Console + Screaming Frog (free) + Google PageSpeed Insights covers 70% of the work.
SEO audit step by step
This is where the real work begins. Follow this order: it has a deliberate logic. Indexation issues block everything else; there is no point optimising content on pages Google cannot even read.
Step 1: Indexation and crawling
Goal: confirm that Google can access your important pages and is not indexing pages it should not.
1.1 Coverage in Search Console
Open Google Search Console > Indexing > Pages. Here you will see the status of all URLs Google has found or attempted to crawl:
- •Indexed: how many pages are in Google's index. Compare this with the actual number of pages on your site.
- •Not indexed: review the reasons. The most serious: "Excluded by 'noindex' tag", "Crawled – currently not indexed", "Page with redirect".
- •Errors: pages with server errors (5xx) or not found (4xx) that Google keeps attempting to crawl.
Warning signal: if your site has 200 pages and Google indexes 40, there is a structural problem (misconfigured canonical, site-wide noindex, outdated sitemap).
1.2 Robots.txt
Access yourdomain.com/robots.txt. Check:
- •Is it blocking entire sections it should not? A
Disallow: /left over from a staging environment pushed to production is one of the most common and devastating errors. - •Is the sitemap referenced?
1.3 XML sitemaps
Submit or review the sitemap in Search Console > Sitemaps. Verify:
- •The URLs in the sitemap correspond to real, indexable pages (no noindex pages, no redirects, no 4xx errors).
- •The sitemap is updated when you publish new content.
1.4 Canonical tags
With Screaming Frog, export the canonicals report. Look for:
- •Pages with no canonical declared.
- •Canonicals pointing to a different URL than the page itself (unintentional cross-canonical).
- •Paginated pages with a canonical to the first page where this is not intended.
1.5 Accidental noindex directives
Filter in Screaming Frog for "noindex". Are any important pages carrying this tag? In WordPress, the "Discourage search engines from indexing this site" setting under Settings > Reading applies a site-wide noindex and is accidentally activated more often than it should be.
Step 2: Technical SEO
Goal: ensure the site is fast, secure and accessible to both users and search engines.
2.1 Core Web Vitals and page speed
Google has used Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal since 2021. There are three metrics:
- •LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): time until the main element of the page is visible. Target: under 2.5 seconds.
- •INP (Interaction to Next Paint): response to the first user interaction. Target: under 200 ms. Replaced FID in 2024.
- •CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): visual stability of the page as it loads. Target: under 0.1.
How to measure them: Google PageSpeed Insights (lab and real-field data) and the Core Web Vitals report in Search Console (real user data segmented by device).
The most common issues:
- •High LCP caused by unoptimised images or incorrect application of the
loading="lazy"attribute. - •CLS caused by web fonts that are not preloaded or ads with no reserved space.
- •High INP caused by third-party JavaScript (chat plugins, ad networks, marketing tools) blocking the main thread.
2.2 Mobile-friendliness
Google indexes in mobile-first mode: Googlebot analyses your site as if it were a smartphone. Check:
- •Responsive design that works on screens 375–430 px wide.
- •Buttons and links with a minimum tap target of 44 px.
- •No content hidden on mobile that exists on desktop (Google sees both equally).
- •No text smaller than 16 px.
Tool: Lighthouse (built into Chrome DevTools) and DevTools device mode let you audit the mobile version. Note: Google removed the Mobile Usability report from Search Console in late 2023, so use Lighthouse or the mobile-friendly test instead.
2.3 HTTPS
The entire site must be served over HTTPS with a valid certificate. Verify:
- •No mixed content (images, scripts or stylesheets served over HTTP on HTTPS pages).
- •The certificate is not expired.
- •HTTP to HTTPS redirects are direct 301s, not chained (HTTP → HTTPS → www.HTTPS).
2.4 URL structure
URLs must be short, descriptive and consistent:
- •No unnecessary parameters in indexable URLs (
?session_id=,?ref=). - •No special characters, uppercase letters or spaces.
- •Logical structure reflecting the site hierarchy (
/services/seo-audit/is better than/p?id=234). - •Consistency: choose between
wwwandnon-www, between trailing slash and no trailing slash, and do not mix them.
2.5 4xx and 5xx errors
Using Screaming Frog or the Search Console coverage report, list all errors:
- •404s with backlinks: deleted pages that still receive external links. These represent authority being lost, fixed by a 301 redirect to the most relevant equivalent page.
- •Internal 404s: pages on the site that link to broken URLs. Update the link or redirect the destination.
- •5xx errors: server errors. They typically indicate hosting or code issues that require urgent attention.
2.6 Redirects
Review redirect chains. A chain of 3 or more hops (A → B → C → D) slows crawling and dilutes authority. Always shorten to a single direct redirect (A → D).
Step 3: On-page SEO
Goal: ensure each page is optimised for the searches it should capture, with no conflicts between pages on the same site.
3.1 Title tags
The <title> is the on-page factor with the most direct influence on rankings. Audit:
- •Does each page have a unique title?
- •Does the title include the target keyword for that page, ideally towards the beginning?
- •Length: between 50 and 60 characters so it is not truncated in search results.
- •No empty titles or CMS default titles ("Home – Site Name").
In Screaming Frog: filter "Page Titles" > export > sort by length and check for duplicates.
3.2 Meta descriptions
Not a direct ranking factor, but it affects CTR (the click-through rate in search results). Google rewrites it when it is not relevant to the query, but a well-written meta improves SERP performance:
- •Ideal length: 140–155 characters.
- •Includes the keyword and an implicit call to action.
- •Unique for each page.
3.3 Headings (H1–H6)
- •Each page must have exactly one H1 that aligns thematically with the title (not necessarily identical, but consistent).
- •H2 and H3 tags structure the content and are where you place keyword variants and related terms.
- •Do not use headings for visual styling: they are semantic hierarchy, not formatting.
3.4 Search intent
This is the most important shift in modern SEO. Google does not rank the page with the most keywords — it ranks the page that best answers what the user wants to do.
There are four types of intent:
- •Informational: I want to learn something ("what is an SEO audit").
- •Navigational: I want to go to a specific site ("Gecko Studio website").
- •Commercial: I am evaluating options ("best SEO agencies London").
- •Transactional: I want to hire or buy ("hire SEO audit").
For each target page, search that keyword in Google and identify what type of content dominates the top results. If "SEO audit" returns only informational guides, a sales landing page will not rank there.
3.5 Keyword cannibalisation
Cannibalisation occurs when two or more pages on your site compete for the same keyword. Google cannot decide which to rank, alternates between them and the end result is weaker than having one well-optimised page.
How to detect it:
- •In GSC: filter by keyword in the Performance report. If you see multiple URLs alternating positions for the same query, there is cannibalisation.
- •With Screaming Frog + GSC data: cross-reference the keywords assigned to each URL.
How to resolve it:
- •If one page is clearly stronger, redirect the weaker one to the stronger (301).
- •If both pages have distinct valuable content, clarify the intent of each and consolidate any overlap.
- •If the differentiation is artificial, merge the two into a single, more comprehensive guide.
Step 4: Content and EEAT signals
Goal: assess whether the content is sufficiently deep, current and trustworthy for Google to consider it the best available answer.
EEAT stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness. Google applies these criteria in its quality rater guidelines to evaluate content, particularly on topics that influence important decisions.
4.1 Content quality and depth
For each strategic page on the site, ask yourself:
- •Does the page answer the question more completely than the competitors currently ranking?
- •Is the content original, or a shallow rewrite of what already exists?
- •Are there data, examples, real cases or first-hand experience that differentiate the content?
- •Is the length appropriate for the intent? (A product page does not need 2,000 words; an in-depth technical guide on a complex decision does.)
4.2 Outdated or stale content
Content that was relevant 3–4 years ago may be losing positions because competitors have updated theirs. Identify:
- •Pages with visible old dates on topics that change (algorithms, regulations, tools).
- •Guides mentioning features or data that no longer exist.
- •Pages ranking in positions 8–15 with no movement for months: these are often prime candidates for an update.
4.3 Thin content
Thin content refers to pages with very little useful content: empty category archive pages, automatically generated pages with variable data, tag pages with a single article. Options:
- •Enrich with genuine content if there is a justification.
- •Consolidate similar pages.
- •Set to noindex if the page adds no value and receives no traffic.
4.4 Specific EEAT signals to review
- •Is the content author identified by name and profile?
- •Is there an "About us" or "Team" page with real profiles?
- •Are data sources and statistics cited?
- •Are there verifiable testimonials, case studies or reviews?
- •Are the privacy policy, legal notice and contact details accessible from every page?
Step 5: Internal linking and architecture
Goal: ensure that internal authority (PageRank) flows correctly from the strongest pages to the pages you want to rank.
5.1 Crawl depth
No important page should be more than 3 clicks from the homepage. Pages deep in the hierarchy receive less internal authority and are crawled less frequently.
In Screaming Frog: use the "Crawl Depth" report > export and filter for strategic pages more than 3 hops away.
5.2 Orphan pages
These are indexed pages that receive no internal links. Google may find them via the sitemap, but without internal links they receive virtually no authority. Locate them using Screaming Frog's "Orphan Pages" report (requires importing the sitemap) or by cross-referencing the sitemap against the list of crawled URLs.
5.3 Anchor text and context of internal links
The anchor text of an internal link is a semantic signal for Google. Always using the same generic anchor ("click here", "find out more") is a missed opportunity. The anchor should be descriptive and relevant to the destination page.
5.4 Authority distribution
Identify the pages with the most external backlinks (using any tool that shows the link profile). Make sure those pages link internally to the pages you most want to rank. Internal link sculpting is one of the highest effort-to-result levers in SEO.
Step 6: External link profile
Goal: get a clear picture of the quantity, quality and distribution of sites linking to yours.
An exhaustive analysis of every backlink is not necessary in a first SEO audit. What you do need to know:
- •Number of unique referring domains: more representative than the total number of backlinks (a single domain can link once or a thousand times; what matters for authority is the distinct domain count).
- •Average domain quality: tools such as Ahrefs (Domain Rating), Moz (Domain Authority) or Semrush (Authority Score) provide a reference score.
- •Anchor distribution: do backlinks use your brand name, naked URLs or exact-match keywords? A profile with many exact-match keyword anchors can signal artificial link building.
- •Time trend: is the number of referring domains growing, stable or declining? A sharp drop can indicate a penalty or loss of relevance.
- •Broken backlinks: external pages linking to URLs on your site that no longer exist. Recover that authority by redirecting those URLs to active equivalent pages.
On low-quality links: if you detect a clear pattern of spam backlinks (low-value directories, link farms, artificial private blog networks), document it. The actions to take depend on volume and context.
Step 7: SEO beyond Google (2026 differentiator)
This is the section most audits ignore, and in 2026 that omission is no longer trivial.
7.1 Bing Webmaster Tools
Bing holds between 5% and 9% market share in many English-speaking markets, and its results feed Microsoft Copilot and several secondary search engines. Check:
- •Is the site verified in Bing Webmaster Tools?
- •Is the sitemap submitted?
- •Are there crawl errors specific to Bingbot that do not appear in GSC?
Setup takes under 20 minutes and prevents Bing-specific issues from going unnoticed for months.
7.2 IndexNow
IndexNow is an instant content-change notification protocol used by Bing, Yandex, Seznam and other search engines. Instead of waiting for a crawler to reach your new URL, the site actively notifies the search engine.
How to enable it: several WordPress SEO plugins integrate IndexNow natively (RankMath supports it out of the box; others via an add-on). Verify it is enabled. For other platforms, implementation requires the API or a webhook.
7.3 llms.txt
An llms.txt file in the root of the domain is the emerging convention (2024–2025) for signalling to language model crawlers which content is suitable for indexing or citation in AI-generated answers. It is the AI-era equivalent of robots.txt.
Check whether the site has yourdomain.com/llms.txt. If it does not exist and the client wants visibility in AI-powered searches, adding it is a low-cost, increasingly relevant action.
7.4 AI Overviews and generative search
Google AI Overviews (the generative summary at the top of results) now appear in many markets for informational queries. Pages cited in those summaries need:
- •A clear structure with direct answers to specific questions.
- •Structured data markup (FAQ, HowTo, Article).
- •Strong EEAT: the model favours sources with verifiable authority.
There is no canonical tool for auditing AI Overviews presence systematically yet, but you can manually sample the top 20 keywords for the site and check whether it appears as a cited source.
Step 8: Prioritising findings
A typical SEO audit generates between 80 and 300 findings. The real work of a professional audit is not finding them — it is ordering them.
Prioritisation framework (Impact × Effort matrix):
| Quadrant | Action | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| High impact, low effort | Do first | Accidental noindex, broken canonical, outdated sitemap, duplicate title on high-traffic pages |
| High impact, high effort | Plan with resources | Rewriting thin content on strategic pages, completing an HTTP to HTTPS migration, redesigning the site architecture |
| Low impact, low effort | Do when capacity allows | Missing meta description on low-traffic pages, inconsistent trailing slash on secondary pages |
| Low impact, high effort | Question whether it is needed | Speed optimisations measured in fractions of a second on pages that already pass Core Web Vitals |
Criteria for raising a finding's priority:
- 1.It affects pages that already receive traffic or backlinks.
- 2.It blocks crawling or indexation (serious technical issue).
- 3.There is a keyword opportunity with low competition and high commercial intent.
- 4.The direct competitor has already addressed it and you have not.
Present findings as concrete actions with an owner and a date, not as a list of abstract problems. "Optimise SEO" is not a task; "update the H1 on the 5 highest-traffic product pages to include the city modifier" is.
Tools for running an SEO audit
You do not need all of them. Choose based on budget and project size.
| Tool | Type | Purpose | Approximate cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search Console | Free | Indexation, keywords, crawl errors, CWV (field data) | Free |
| Google Analytics 4 | Free | User behaviour, landing pages, conversions | Free |
| Google PageSpeed Insights | Free | Core Web Vitals, LCP, CLS, INP, improvement suggestions | Free |
| Screaming Frog SEO Spider | Freemium | Full site crawl (up to 500 URLs free) | Free / £259 per year |
| Bing Webmaster Tools | Free | Crawling and indexation in Bing | Free |
| Ahrefs | Paid | Backlinks, keywords, advanced crawling, SERP overview | From ~$99/month |
| Semrush | Paid | Keywords, competitor analysis, backlinks, on-page audit | From ~$120/month |
| SE Ranking | Paid | More affordable option with similar features | From ~$65/month |
| Sitebulb | Paid | Visual crawling, highly useful for client presentations | From ~$14/month |
| Seoptimer / Seobility | Freemium | Quick basic diagnostic, useful as a first overview | Free / from $40/month |
| Rich Results Test / Schema.org Validator | Free | Validate structured data (schema) | Free |
For a first audit with no budget: Search Console + GA4 + Screaming Frog (free) + PageSpeed Insights is a solid combination that covers 70–75% of the analysis.
Common mistakes when conducting an SEO audit
After more than a decade of SEO audits, these are the errors that recur most frequently:
1. Starting with content before reviewing the technical layer.
If there is an accidental noindex or the sitemap is broken, optimising titles achieves nothing. Technical issues always come first.
2. Confusing symptoms with causes.
"Low traffic" is not a finding — it is a symptom. The audit must reach the cause (indexation problem? incorrect keyword intent? weak link profile?).
3. Using only one tool.
Every tool has blind spots. Search Console does not crawl the full site; Screaming Frog has no real-field performance data; Ahrefs has its own backlink index that differs from Semrush's.
4. Not distinguishing between active problems and historical findings.
A 404 on a URL that never received traffic or backlinks does not warrant the same treatment as a 404 on a page with 50 external domains linking to it.
5. Delivering the report without prioritisation.
A list of 200 unordered problems is, in practice, useless. The value of the audit lies in the judgement used to order the actions.
6. Ignoring business context.
An audit recommending the rewriting of 80 product pages does not account for the team's available resources. Recommendations must be feasible, not just theoretically correct.
7. Skipping the follow-up.
An audit without a 3- and 6-month follow-up plan is a document that expires the moment it is published. SEO issues are resolved through iteration, not one-off fixes.
SEO audit checklist (actionable summary)
A final mental walkthrough before closing the audit. Tick each point:
Indexation and crawling
- GSC coverage reviewed: indexed pages vs. expected count
- robots.txt checked: no accidental blocks
- Sitemap submitted and error-free in GSC
- Noindex: all tagged pages reviewed; no important pages affected
- Canonicals: no broken or unintentional cross-canonicals
Technical SEO
- Core Web Vitals: LCP <2.5s, INP <200ms, CLS <0.1 on mobile and desktop
- Mobile: responsive design with no errors
- HTTPS: valid certificate, no mixed content, direct HTTP redirect
- URLs: consistent structure, no unnecessary parameters on indexable URLs
- 4xx with backlinks: identified and redirected
- Redirect chains: shortened to a single hop
On-page
- Titles: unique, <60 characters, keyword towards the start on strategic pages
- Meta descriptions: unique, <155 characters, present on strategic pages
- H1: one per page, consistent with the title
- Cannibalisation: main target keywords reviewed
- Search intent: content format matches the SERP
Content and EEAT
- Thin pages identified: action defined (enrich / consolidate / noindex)
- Outdated content: update priority assigned
- Author identified on articles and guides
- Sources cited for data and statistics
Architecture and internal links
- No strategic page more than 3 clicks from the homepage
- Orphan pages identified and linked or removed from the index
- Descriptive anchor text on internal links to strategic pages
External link profile
- Referring domain trend: stable or growing
- Broken backlinks with value: redirected
- Anchor profile: no obvious artificial patterns
Search engines and AI (2026)
- Bing Webmaster Tools: verified and sitemap submitted
- IndexNow: enabled in the CMS
- llms.txt: present or decision taken on whether to create it
- Structured data: valid and error-free in the testing tool
Prioritisation
- Findings classified by impact and effort
- Top 5 highest-immediate-impact actions defined with an owner
- Follow-up date set (minimum 3 months)
Go deeper into each part of the SEO audit
This guide is the overall map. Each block has its own in-depth analysis with real examples and concrete figures:
Frequently asked questions about SEO audits
How long does an SEO audit take?
It depends on the size of the site and the depth of the analysis. For a site of 50–200 pages with full tool access, a complete audit takes between 8 and 20 hours of work. For online stores with thousands of products or portals with millions of URLs, the process can take days or weeks. An automated quick scan can deliver an initial diagnosis in 1–2 hours, but without manual analysis and a prioritisation framework it loses most of its value.
How often should you run an SEO audit?
A full audit makes sense at least once a year. For actively growing projects (e-commerce, content portals, sites publishing and modifying content frequently), every 6 months. Partial reviews covering indexation, new content and technical changes should be part of the monthly workflow, not annual events.
Is it possible to run an SEO audit for free?
Yes, with limitations. Google Search Console, Google Analytics 4 and Screaming Frog (up to 500 URLs) cover the fundamentals at no cost. The areas that fall short without paid tools are mainly: competitive keyword analysis, a full backlink profile and detailed ranking analysis for medium and large sites.
What is the difference between an SEO audit and a web audit?
An SEO audit focuses on visibility and rankings in search engines. A web audit is a broader diagnostic that also covers UX, conversion, security, accessibility and business performance. SEO is one layer of a full web audit. If you need the comprehensive diagnostic, ask about what a complete web audit entails.
Can an automated tool replace a manual SEO audit?
No. Automated tools are essential for collecting data at scale (crawling 5,000 URLs in minutes, cross-referencing GSC data with the site inventory), but analysis, interpretation and prioritisation require human judgement. A list of 300 errors produced by a crawler is not an SEO audit — it is the raw material from which to build one.
Does an SEO audit apply to any type of website?
Yes, although the emphasis varies. An e-commerce site prioritises product page crawlability, URL parameter errors and category pages. A blog or content portal focuses on architecture, cannibalisation and content quality. A corporate services site centres more on key landing pages, search intent and the link profile. The method is the same; the weight given to each phase changes.
What should you do if the SEO audit uncovers many problems?
That is normal. A thorough audit of a mature site will surface dozens of findings. The goal is not zero problems (that is unrealistic) — it is knowing which 5–10 issues most affect rankings and tackling them in order. Technical perfection is not the aim; qualified traffic and business objectives are.
Do you need an SEO audit for a brand-new website?
Not in the same form. A new site needs a technical launch review: confirm correct indexation, check for accidental noindex directives left over from staging, verify the sitemap is properly configured and that Core Web Vitals are reasonable from the start. A full audit makes more sense once the site has been live for 6 to 12 months and there is real performance data available in Search Console.
Would you prefer a professional team to handle it?
This guide covers the complete process for anyone who wants to run the audit themselves. But doing an SEO audit properly takes time, access to multiple tools and the judgement to prioritise findings correctly.
If you would rather delegate the diagnostic to an experienced team, at Gecko Studio we conduct professional SEO audits with an in-depth analysis of the 8 blocks covered in this guide, a prioritised action plan and ongoing results tracking.